![]() HTML accessibility support (like for instance for the visually impaired), although much has improved in Outlook 2016, Outlook 2019 and Microsoft 365.“advanced” css formatting support (which could lead to malformed newsletters).gif images don’t animate ( unless you are using Microsoft 365).The most noticeable features that are broken are ![]() For an overview of unsupported features and a workaround see Automatic spell check and Autocorrect not working. However, none of these features were available in the classic Outlook editor either. There are some features which does require you to have the same version of Outlook and Word installed. You see? They really gave it some thought and you’ll benefit from it that you won’t lose Word as the email editor if you choose to only upgrade Outlook. If it is not installed, Outlook will install the so called “stub” of Word that Outlook uses to function correctly and display the new editor. When you install Outlook, it will detect if Word is installed as well. No, you don’t have to buy Word to use Outlook. So now I have to buy Word as well? Ripoff! Obviously, now that Microsoft Edge has replaced Internet Explorer, the choice to rely on an editor that is part of Office has been validated once again. This choice has been validated by the fair share of inconsistencies (and bugs) Outlook 2003 had depending on whether you are using it with Internet Explorer 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11.Īn additional explanation has also been posted by Microsoft, when the discussion was brought up again shortly before the release of the Public Beta of Outlook 2010, in the blog post The Power of Word in Outlook (the original article is no longer available so Thank you Internet Archive!). The fact that Outlook and Word have the same release and support cycle will make things even less complicated. So instead of expanding the features of the limited Outlook editor, and basically build another Word, reusing what they had already made sense. Also, in usage, emails are much more treated like documents than like web pages. Well, Internet Explorer only displays HTML and the functionality of the Outlook editor was rather limited. Why didn’t they choose Internet Explorer or Outlook? With Outlook 2007, and continued in all later versions, they decided to get rid of both Word and Outlook as the email editor and replaced it with a single completely new and revamped editor (with Ribbon support!) based on Word. ![]() When you had Word as the email editor it used the Word engine to generate HTML and offered Word composing features. In previous versions, Outlook displayed the emails with the HTML rendering engine from Internet Explorer and when you had Outlook as the email editor, it used its own (limited) engine to generate it. Since the change, Outlook now only has to support 1 email editor (HTML engine) which makes developing a lot easier and you’ll get a much more consistent behavior which increases your email experience. Well… maybe they do, but not when it comes to Outlook though. Now of course the Outlook developers at Microsoft didn’t break it because they like to break things. This guide has been slightly updated from the original, which was published in September 2007, to also take Outlook 2010, Outlook 2013 and Outlook 2016, Outlook 2019 and Microsoft 365 into account. So what is this really all about? Well, to put it short because it breaks some stuff… But really, trust me, it’s not completely a bad thing that it does so. There had been quite some fuss about this before its release and again before the release of Outlook 2010. Starting with Outlook 2007, Outlook uses only the Word engine to display and create HTML-formatted emails.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |